Review Process

Prior to commencing the article review, please take cognizance of the following directives:

  • Reviewers should assess articles that align with their field of expertise. If a reviewer deems it necessary, they may inform the editor and propose an alternate reviewer for the particular case.
  • The review process is expected to be concluded within a two-week timeframe. Should reviewers unanimously agree on the need for an extended period, prompt notification to the editor is essential, or an alternative reviewer can be suggested.

Pre-Review Procedures:

  • The Editor of Journal of Theology Vocational Dei will scrutinize the submitted manuscript for grammatical accuracy, adherence to writing conventions, and alignment with the Focus and Scope of Journal of Theology Vocational Dei.
  • The Editor of Journal of Theology Vocational Dei will verify the presence of essential sections such as Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Methods, Discussion, and Conclusion in the author's manuscript.
  • The Editor of Journal of Theology Vocational Dei will assess the manuscript references to ensure the inclusion of primary references, with at least 70% derived from journal articles.
  • The Editor of Journal of Theology Vocational Dei will conduct a plagiarism check on the manuscript.

Peer Review Procedures:

  • Articles submitted to Journal of Theology Vocational Dei will undergo evaluation by a minimum of two blind reviewers who are appropriately qualified experts in the relevant field, selected by the Editor-in-Chief.
  • The Editor-in-Chief or a designated member of the Editorial Board will make decisions to accept, reject, or request revisions based on the reviews and comments provided by the reviewers.
  • Editors will assess whether each submission entails well-conducted research, with conclusions logically derived from the presented data in the manuscript.